Sunday, December 10, 2006
By Emily Ingram
Tribune-Herald staff writer
When a Bellmead father received a letter from his son’s school district saying the 4-year-old had inappropriately touched a teacher’s aide, he said he couldn’t believe what he was reading.
|
“When I got that letter, my world flipped,” DaMarcus Blackwell said.
The Nov. 13 letter from La Vega Independent School District stated his son, who was 4 years old at the time, was involved in “inappropriate physical behavior interpreted as sexual contact and/or sexual harassment” after the boy hugged a teacher’s aide and “rubbed his face in the chest of (the) female employee” on Nov. 10.
The letter also stated Blackwell’s son, who Blackwell requested not be named in this story for privacy reasons, spent the day in in-school suspension (ISS) as punishment for the incident.
Blackwell has since filed a complaint with the district.
In turn, the district changed the offense to “inappropriate physical contact” and removed references of sexual contact or sexual harassment from the boy’s file, according to a subsequent letter from the district.
Still, Blackwell said the change isn’t enough.
Putting out six bananas on the table, he asks, “What do you see? You say you see six bananas, but I say no, it’s half a dozen. That’s the same thing with this. Call it what you want, it’s the same thing.”
Blackwell and his wife, Patricia, say their son does not know why he was sent to ISS.
Blackwell said school officials may have told him the reason for the punishment, but they say as parents, they should have been there when the punishment was explained.
A letter from the school district said efforts to telephone the parents about the incident failed.
Still, Blackwell said the district should have made more of an effort to include the parents in the issue.
School officials refused to comment on the incident, referring to student privacy laws.
Al Bishop, La Vega ISD assistant superintendent for personnel and administration, said he could comment only on the policy.
According to the district’s student handbook, Bishop said, there are no specific rules or guidelines referring to contact between teachers and students.
There is a general statement, though, that says inappropriate physical contact will result in a discipline referral, he said.
While the handbook does not state what is inappropriate, Bishop conceded that determination came to a judgment call by school officials.
Bishop said a discipline referral goes into a student’s discipline file, which is a part of the personal file.
Not all discipline referrals go into a student’s permanent record, and each year the student’s discipline file is removed, kept for one to two years and then destroyed, he said.
In the Blackwell’s case, Bishop said he could not comment on whether a discipline referral was a part of the boy’s permanent record.
Blackwell could not clarify whether the discipline report went into the boy’s permanent record.
Regardless of where the report was filed, Blackwell said, the issue for him is that his son was punished for an act he is too young to understand.
The question of whether a touch is meant inappropriately or is an innocent gesture by a young child is not as easily answered through a checklist of factors, said David Davis, executive director of the Advocacy Center for Crime Victims & Children in Waco.
“A lot of variables come into play,” Davis said, adding he doesn’t know the details of Blackwell’s son’s incident.
Variables such as age, maturity and exposure to factors like pornography or even molestation, influence whether a touch is innocent or not, he said.
In the recent case of a La Vega Independent School District elementary student who allegedly inappropriately touched a teacher’s aide, Davis said the things to consider are not as much the gestures themselves as the behavior afterward.
“It’s a concern if a child didn’t respond to redirection,” Davis said. “I would be more concerned about a child’s response to limits set by an adult more than the touch itself.”
Davis said some young children touch — sometimes inappropriately — out of curiosity.
When told they have done something inappropriate, a child who was acting out of curiosity would then typically withdraw or act embarrassed and respond to the redirection, Davis said.
A child whose actions were deliberately inappropriate would act compulsively, aggressively or through manipulation, Davis said.
The child would not respond to redirection, and his or her actions would continue.
While a touch could be read as innocent or inappropriate, “it is the behavior itself” that must be evaluated, Davis said.
eingram@wacotrib.com
757-5745





Comments
By Vince
Dec 13, 2006 12:10 AM | Link to this
The real victim here is the child. Either the child is being abused (in some form) at home, in which case the school has bungled its response to the situation by focusing on the child instead of the home, or the hug truly was completely innocent, in which case the school has grossly overreacted. In either case, the child is not at fault, and the school's response was inappropriate to the situation.
By Heather
Dec 12, 2006 11:14 PM | Link to this
I agree with the comments that the child and parents need to be investigated but jesus people... get a grip, aye?? You're taking it wayyy overboard with the aide. You're acting like the children in the school yard ganging up because on person starts to tease first. Grow balls and grow the hell UP.
Much luv...
By Jon
Dec 12, 2006 11:02 PM | Link to this
Is no one here willing to admit that the child's behavior might be truly innappropriate? It's NOT the child's fault, but it is a sign of serious dysfunction in the home. Note that the article indicates repeated attempts to contact the parents failed. Keep burning your teachers at the stake and letting incompetent parents raise dysfunctional children... if you want an education system frought with lawsuits and a lack of morality just move to California already.
By Peter
Dec 12, 2006 10:59 PM | Link to this
I was speechless when I read the article. Thanks god the comments gave me happiness - the good people are more.
By Jon
Dec 12, 2006 10:53 PM | Link to this
STOP! If you believe the teacher's aide is at fault here you are being ignorant. From the content of the story all she did was identify a child's behavior as innappropriate. That's where things went wrong. The district should have initiated an immediate investigation with Child Protective Services. ANY child is capable of willfull misbehavior. An abused child replicates that abuse, if they are hit, they hit others. IT IS THE ADMINISTRATION AND THE DISTRICT WHO ARE AT FAULT HERE.
By Seething in Seattle
Dec 12, 2006 10:11 PM | Link to this
That lunatic aid is a liability for any potential employer she may have. She seems to carry the mindset that all males are potential rapists. I work for a gov't agency and we are all too often brainwashed that the intent of the act is at the sole interpretation of the receiver. Such non-humans should be labeled for life as those who cry wolf just as society labels adjudicated offenders. The school board needs consider their options before that superintendent's contract is extended.
By someone
Dec 12, 2006 10:06 PM | Link to this
I just wonder if this teacher aide has children? Anyone with kids would not take offense to this jester. My kids give there teachers hugs everytime we see them, they glady accept with open arms. Children need that affection sometimes. I hope she finds herself a new profession. She should never work with children again.
By Teacher
Dec 12, 2006 9:28 PM | Link to this
I've been in education for over 14 years now, primarily working in disciplinary alternative schools. I see what happens to kids when they are labeled as "bad". I have no idea whatsoever what is going on in the mind of the aide or the principal who supported such nonsense. The child was either being affectionate, experimental, or has been abused in a manner which would lead to something genuinely inappropriate. The poor little guy needs an advocate, not ISS. WHAT is WRONG with these people?!?
By stranger
Dec 12, 2006 9:10 PM | Link to this
I agree that this aid and principal should be fired If anyone is at fault it is the these so called educators. I hope the parents stay the course and go even farther by getting this so called aid banned from ever working with children again.
By Stranger
Dec 12, 2006 8:42 PM | Link to this
I happened to touch the shoulder of a 6 year old girl from behind her to call her attention to prevent a big accident. I have witnesses. That night the police came over to my house to check my ID. I am no pedophile. The girl complained to her parents that I "touched" her. WE ARE ALL SICK...!!!
[1 2 3] next
Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F, except on Tuesday when it's open until 9 p.m.
Post a comment
*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.