Video: Obama’s October surprise

by Infidelesto on October 12, 2008 · Comments

This video needs to be seen by all voters, especially independents.

What strikes me is Berg’s credibility in law and politics in Pennsylvania.  This isn’t just some kook who decided to file lawsuit.  This case actually seems credible.  Will it ever make it to trial? who knows.  What I think is interesting is that we’re talking about a lawsuit filed by a lifelong Democrat, former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania, chairman of the Democrat party in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, member of Democrat State committee, and formerly ran for Governor and the Senate.  This isn’t some Joe shmoe of the streets.Also, this has Clinton’s dirty work written all over it.

*update*

Ed Morrissey at Hotair says this is just more conspiracy nutjob thinking that’s distracting us from the real issues.  I tend to disagree.  I think the American people have a right to know and if the birth certificate that was put out at factcheck.org and his website have some inconsistencies, then the people have a right to the truth.

What would happen if Obama becomes President and then this case actually makes it to the Supreme Court? What if Obama is found to NOT be a natural born citizen? Does Biden then become president? Is the Democratic ticket disqualified and Pelosi takes over? Or would there be another general election?

This could create a constitutional crisis if it goes that far.  I don’t think anyone really knows what would happen, as we would have never seen this before in American history.

American Thinker adds this:

    But you can get people to watch 11 minutes of interesting video raising a slew of questions for Obama, in fact cornering him, on the question of his birth, citizenship, and eligibility for office as POTUS under the Constitution. Especially if people start talking about the video. It’s called viral distribution. A friend emails an Obama-supporting friend and dares him or her to watch.
    A lifelong Democrat who has held political office and been a committeeman, Philip Berg, has brought suit over the real questions raised by the absence of a valid Obama birth certificate. His narrative of the various questions Obama has refused to answer is devastating. Graphics and sound are well-deployed to avoid tedium as factual data is conveyed in a way that allows viewers to absorb it. When he contrasts Obama’s behavior when challenged (use perfectly valid legal technicalities to delay) with John McCain’s full disclosure of all documentary evidence under a similar challenge (remember the flap over his birth in the Panama Canal Zone? — who raised those questions, anyway?), there is no doubt in a viewer’s mind that there is something seriously wrong here.
    We are talking about the Presidency and this guy stonewalls?
    The only way Obama can satisfactorily respond is to release his suposed Hawaiian birth certificate. If he has it, why hasn’t he released it? If he does release it, game over. So why drag this out on technical grounds? It doesn’t make sense.

    If this video gets widely viewed and discussed, Obama’s support will crumble in the face of continued stonewalling.

    I am grateful for the efforts of the people who put this op together. It is brilliantly timed. I do know that there are one or more smart Democrats who haven’t forgiven Obama and who don’t want to see him elected. They know how to design and implement really effective plans to get things done.