What`s the difference between a liberal and a terrorist?
By Bernie on 09 Jul 2006
In my last post, Michelle Malkin - Cruella de Blog, I implied that leftists and defeatists were enemies to this great nation of ours.
I am sorry for the implication. I should have stated it clearly: Leftists, defeatists, appeasers, liberals, and all who vote and support them are enemies of the United States. Somebody has to say it.
They are not in the same category as terrorists, however. Terrorists should be shot on the spot. Leftists, on the other hand, should be given a trial first. Defeatists, appeasers, and moderate Muslims all pose a grave threat to our society. Even anti-war activists are enemies as well. Do you know when it is patriotic and acceptable to be anti-war? When we are not fighting one. Otherwise, such actions only have the effect of demoralizing our troops and giving aid and comfort to our enemies. And please, I am not saying you don't have the right to be an idiot or traitor. We are in America. One can certainly legally be a Cindy Sheehan. On the other hand, I also have the right to call her a manipulated fool who is an enemy of this country.
You do not shit where you eat. Otherwise you are no better than a zoo animal. Let me explain it to those of you, like the New York Times, that would destroy this nation rather than have George Bush as President. Palestinian terrorists so hate Israel that they willingly sacrifice their children as cannon fodder. Indeed, Golda Meir saw clearly that, "Peace will come when the Arabs will love their children more than they hate us."
A reader left a comment recently asking me if I thought most black people to be my enemies?" I thought it was clear that since black voters are their own best enemies, they are also enemies to a civilized society. And Black Muslims are a greater threat than al-Qaeda.
Even though I am an Atheist Jew, sadly I count my Jewish brethren who are liberals also as enemies of this country. Despite Jews' consistent sympathy and votes for black causes, blacks are 4 times more anti-Semitic than whites. Funny how all that heart-bleeding for affirmative action and civil rights causes hasn't made blacks feel any gratitude towards Jews.
It was the greatest appeaser and coward Jimmy Carter that made 9/11 possible:
The Iranians were emboldened by a paper tiger that did nothing to rescue American Hostages. Thus the Soviet Union, fearing that a craven American policy of fear would allow the Iranian Revolution to be exported to the rest of the world, especially the Soviet world, invaded Afghanistan.
Did any cowardly appeaser ever wonder why the Soviet Union would spend so much money and men it could ill afford to go into a country that had no mineral or any other value at all? The most bleak, worthless piece of crap earth on the planet and they invaded it!
I'll tell you why: precisely because they saw that the Iranians would spread their Islamic Revolution there next and from there to Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and other Soviet Socialist Republics with sizable Muslim populations.
And because of Carter's sheer cowardice and stupidity the US was forced to arm and train Muslim Jihadists to prevent the Soviets from spreading their hegemony into the Middle East. It was those men we were forced to train that planned and executed 9/11.
Yes, leftists, appeasers, defeatists, peaceniks and cowards are enemies of this Republic. Not mortal enemies, but insidious ones nonetheless.
Those blacks and those Jews who blindly vote for Liberals are indeed enemies of this country. It's not pleasant to say. But there you have it. Years ago, this nation could tolerate liberals and we could even laugh at them, after all, they only screwed up the economy and kept blacks in poverty. But now, with our country's very survival at stake, we can no longer abide these kinds of people.
In fact most liberals do not even realize they are a threat to this nation. They are like monkeys armed with an uzi, oblivious to the great danger they pose to themselves and the rest of society. Ask any drunk driver if they are a threat to society and with blithe ignorance they will be insulted with your accusation. Unfortunately for the rest of us, Liberals have so screwed up public education that most blacks will continue to vote for liberal agendas never realizing why they, as a group, are consistently left out of the American mainstream. And most Jews, despite their seeming intelligence will continue to vote for "socially responsible" causes because they "feel guilty" they owe something to those less fortunate than themselves.
As I answered in my comment to that reader:
that "most black people" as well as "most Jews" vote against their best interests from either stupidity or from a misplaced sense of social responsibility. Both groups have voted for and supported liberal agendas that have only served to keep the black race and other minorities in perpetual poverty. Welfare, minimum wage, Unions, no public school vouchers, and even Ebonics or Spanish in schools.
If elections were held in voting booths that stripped out all party affiliations and candidate names and instead held lines such as
1) What's good for black people, for the economy, for world peace
then no Democrat or Liberal would ever be elected.
I suppose I could be politically correct and patronize everyone but that would not only insult blacks and Jews but be a seditious act in this day and age. Being polite when your very existence is at stake is too stupid for me, if you don't mind.
Related: Newt Gingrich, former House speaker (R-GA) and Fox News political analyst: "You would think that The New York Times, located on the same island where the World Trade Center once existed, would have some residual memory of 9-11. You'd think that The New York Times ... would have some sense of survival. ... [M]y sense is that they hate George W. Bush so much that they would be prepared to cripple America in order to go after the president." [Media Matters - Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, 6/26/06] See video.
Gateway Pundit [defunct blog] - Threatening Children is Nothing New for Deranged Leftists, Excerpt:
Jeff Goldstein, an exceptional conservative blogger and writer, is currently under attack by unhinged Leftists. This is nothing new for Jeff or for conservative writers, but one particular deranged Leftist psychology professor ramped up the derangement controls and has threatened Jeff and his infant son!
Here's how the left views freedom of expression:
[Click on image(s) for larger view]
For more of my articles like this see Politics, - Liberal View, Meta, -Differences
Comments
Say what you want, as long as it's on topic, I can take it. My Comment Policy can be read HERE.
To upload a new avatar click on the default avatar.
To add your blog URL click on the FROM button.
Subscribe to comments feed
TrackBacks from Old System
- Open Trackback Weekend #9 from 123beta
OK, it's been a good week, but now's it's time for the Trackback party to begin. So link your posts here all weekend! [Read More]Tracked on July 9, 2006 08:59 PM
Comments from Old Comment System
- Dang ..Bernie...right on spot again!..i will try the TB but it doesnt seem to go thru with yer tb URL..mebbe I will haloscan it this time..:)
- Bernie, Damn good post. Finally, the truth.
- Hey thanks for clarifying. Its good to seen you won't mince words when pressed. Now that the meaning of your conviction is clear, I'm curious about its depth. I have never been in a demonstration against the Iraq war and nor have I ever protested the Iraq war, I have never said anything in support of it either though. I have been a vocal supporter of the war in Afghanistan and I voted for the libertarian candidate in the last presidential election. Am I an enemy of the country? "Those blacks and those Jews who blindly vote for Liberals are indeed enemies of this country." So, how does a true patriot like yourself react to enemies of the country when your own government is corrupted to the core with them? Are you just going to whine about it in your blog or are you going to take your country back with force? Will you personally execute those Americans you know to be enemies as evidenced by thier admission of voting for an anti-Iraq war candidate? Is voting for Kerry grounds for execution if said voting were proven (in a court of law or otherwise)? Or do you have to be a public war protester before execution is warranted? At the risk of distracting from those two main questions, I'm curious about your views on school prayer and the pledge of allegiance (the "under god" part, specifically). You mentioned that you were an athiest. If you have kids in school, how would you react to a best-case scenario where the pledge (with the "under-god" part included) was made mandatory in all public schools? Maybe that's another post too?
- If you voted Libertarian then you cannot be an enemy. FYI - At the quick politics quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz-score/quiz.php I score 100% on both the personal and economic scale for Libertarian. That might answer some of your questions. But the devil is in the details, so I will again blog my answers to your questions. Perhaps a blogpost per question. Yes or no answers won't do it. Thanks for your questions - it happens that this blog answer to your question made it to the top blog post for TTLB at http://truthlaidbear.com/index.php for July 9th.
- I'm having a faster internet connection installed at the house today so I have some time for this. After re-reading my comment and your post I thought some clarification of where I'm confused might be in order. My confusion stems primarily from the third paragraph of your post. "They are not in the same category as terrorists, however. Terrorists should be shot on the spot. Leftists, on the other hand, should be given a trial first." Ok. So if leftists are found guilty of being enemies (enemies being defiend as someone who is anti-war, right?) then they should be executed. Right? "And please, I am not saying you don't have the right to be an idiot or traitor." Now I'm confused, one certainly doesn't have the right to be a traitor in America. Any traitorious act should be tried and executed. I'm thinking of people like Aldrich Ames. "We are in America. One can certainly legally be a Cindy Sheehan." In the first part of the third paragraph you implied that leftists should be tried and shot if they are found guilty of being an enemy of the state. You also defined "leftists, defeatists, appeasers, liberals, and all who vote and support them [as] enemies of the United States" but then in this sentence near the end you say that one can legally be a Cindy Sheehan. Since Cindy Sheehan is very much a leftist, defeatist, appeaser, and a liberal I sense a conflict. If in your opinion, all leftist enemies of the state should be tried and shot, how can you then go on to admit the contrary opinon that one can legally be a leftist enemy of the state like Cindy Sheehan? "On the other hand, I also have the right to call her a manipulated fool who is an enemy of this country." I don't think anyone questioned your right to call her a fool. However calling her a fool and calling for her trial and execution are two very different things. Seriously, if you think Cindy Sheehan is a traitorious enemy of the state like Aldrich Ames you should do something about it, since our government refuses to apparently. But if you think she has the legal right to do what she does, then she (and all leftists who act within the law) isn't an enemy of the state after all, is she? Leftists might be your ideological opponents, but if you really feel they acts within thier legal rights, no matter how misguided, then they aren't an "enemy" of the USA. At worst they might be your personal enemy, but even then I think the word opponent is more accurate. I seriously doubt you have plans to use the threat of force against Cindy Sheehan or any other law-abiding American citizen with whom you have an ideological qualm. Again, I use the phrase "threat of force" because it is key to the definition of an enemy. Thanks in advance for your response.
- "If you voted Libertarian then you cannot be an enemy." Perhaps then you weren't aware that the libertarians are deafeatists (according to your own definition of a defeatist). According to the Libertarian party's website "The first step [to dealing with the war in Iraq] is immediately to begin the withdrawal of all American troops from Iraq." http://www.lp.org/ies.shtml The Libertarian party has also been "...fielding congressional candidates across the country who favor the withdrawal of all military forces from Iraq." http://www.lp.org/media/article_362.shtml So I ask you again, since I voted for Badnarik in 2004, am I an enemy of the state?
- apologies for all the typos, I'm distracted by the installers at the moment.
- Actually this: "Seriously, if you think Cindy Sheehan is a traitorious enemy of the state like Aldrich Ames you should do something about it, since our government refuses to apparently." is an interesting argument. I think all kidnappers should be arrested, put on trial, and if convicted put in jail. Does this mean I am morally bound to go around hunting for all unresolved kidnapping cases? If a DA does not have enough evidence even though they suspect someone of kidnapping, should I then "do something about it?" I am opposed to illegal immigration (but I do want millions of legal immigrants) although I do not want our government rounding up 11 million people and deporting them. Know why? Because Hitler with the greatest, most efficient killing machine in history could not round up all the Jews, how should I expect our government to do almost twice as many? I'm not talking about killing, I'm talking about rounding up. But I will blog the rest. So far you have given me about 6 topics to write about. I am on my way to work - so I will finish this when I get in.
Comment by: Angel
on July 9, 2006 06:45 PM
Comment by: bmorgan
on July 9, 2006 08:10 PM
Comment by: planck's constant
on July 10, 2006 10:28 AM
Comment by: planck's constant
on July 10, 2006 11:30 AM
You may republish any content from Planck's Constant and use it for any non-commercial purpose without needing my permission as long as you link back to the original article.
Read my License.

