Want to see something hilarious? Want to fall on the floor busting your gut with laughter? Then look at these images of Bush as Hitler. The photos [disclaimer - yes, they are photoshopped] are not humorous; what is humorous is that leftists who trivialize the memory of one of the world's most evil creature by comparing him to George Bush now go ballistic when Leiberman has the audacity to call Islamic fascism a greater evil than Nazism.
For years we have seen leftists waving posters of George Bush in Nazi drag as if he is somehow the epitome of evil. But when Leiberman rightly compares the most brutal, vicious, barbaric, inhumane, rapacious evil religion that ever existed on this planet to Nazis, whoa, they all get their panties in a twist.
Daily KOS, CT-Sen: Lieberman is seriously unhinged
Seriously, I really do want to get my vacation started. But how can you ignore things like this?"I'm worried that too many people, both in politics and out, don't appreciate the seriousness of the threat to American security and the evil of the enemy that faces us -- more evil, or as evil, as Nazism and probably more dangerous than the Soviet Communists we fought during the long Cold War," Mr. Lieberman said.More evil than the guys who gassed 6 million Jews?
More dangerous than the guys who had thousands of nuclear warheads pointed at us and could've snuffed out all life on the planet at the press of a button?
Lieberman has lost it. Completely and utterly. He is insane.
Most of the time I call leftist idiots like Kos simply defeatist cowards, but now I see that they are seriously mentally impaired as well. So let me teach you something about the Soviets and Muslims that you idiots do not comprehend.
Soviets never had a death wish. So the fact that they had thousands of nuclear warheads pointed at us was a minuscule threat compared to Iran having even one warhead. Know why? Allah Will Know His Own. Do you know what that means you morons? It means the lunatics running Iran have no compunction against using a nuke against us even knowing that their country would be incinerated. When everyone dies Allah will know his own, will know which souls to allow into heaven. Allah will sort out all the details.
Look at Hezbollah. They saw how the Israelis reacted to Hamas, so they were not really surprised nor did they care at the devastation unleashed upon themselves or the rest of Lebanon when they started the war. They don't care if they die. The Soviets were at least human beings, not mad dogs like Muslims.
A tip of the turban to Indigo Red for : In a WALL STREET JOURNAL op-ed Tuesday, Princeton's Bernard Lewis writes: "There is a radical difference between the Islamic Republic of Iran and other governments with nuclear weapons. This difference is expressed in what can only be described as the apocalyptic worldview of Iran's present rulers."
Common Sense Political Thught, The Lost Kos loses it
If Sheikh Nasrallah (and his Iranian puppeteers) were willing to sacrifice civilians in southern Lebanon to set off an engagement they cannot, and know they cannot, win militarily, why ought we to think that the same logic that kept Nikita Khrushchev and Leonid Brezhnev from sending nuclear weapons our way would deter the Islamist leaders, if they had those weapons?
So in this regard, Leiberman is absolutely correct: the Islamic threat is more dangerous than the Soviet Communists. Only an idiot KOSsack would disagree.
And one important point: The Soviet Union disappeared when we outspent them. Islam will not disappear from lack of funding. No one really believed in the Soviet System enough to keep it going after it went bankrupt. Except for perhaps our own homegrown leftists and the New York Times.
As for more evil than Nazism, again, Hitler only wanted to kill all the Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, mentally retarded and Communists. Muslims on the other hand want to destroy all the Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, mentally retarded, Communists, Buddhists, Hindus, Christians, Taoists, blacks, and everyone else who is not their particular brand of Muslim and subjugate the female half of the Muslim world. At least Hitler did not want to kill everyone who wasn't German. That Muslims have not yet killed every living Jew is just a timing matter, and not from a lack of desire, so spare me the idiotic remark about Hitler killing 6 million Jews. Islam can make Hitler look like a piker.
Again, in this regard, Leiberman is absolutely correct: Islam is more evil than Nazism. Only an idiot KOSsack would disagree.
By the way, if the KOS idiots are celebrating over the Lieberman loss, then think about this: All Kos really did was show to the rest of the United states that a Pro-Bush candidate got 48% of the Democratic Vote! If they view this as a victory then they are bigger morons than I ever imagined.
It took the Nazis years of training of their Hitler Youth to get good Nazis. Indeed, madrasahs have been educating their young to became martyrs from birth, long before we ever entered Iraq. What America has done for the last 50 years is not what fries Osama bin Laden's eggs. What really irks him is what Crusaders did to his people 700 years ago and what the West did to the Ottoman Empire in 1918. The current situation in Iraq is just any old excuse to further his goal to establish a world wide Caliphate. These poor deluded KOSsacks pretend that the global jihad is not a jihad, and hope that thereby it will go away. The Anchoress puts the KOSsacks in their place who whine that "None of this would be happening if Bush had not invaded Iraq".
I think the left is giving warning to our enemies. By letting Muslims know that our government always arrests extremists only when Bush needs a bump in the polls or to diminish partisan success, like the Lamont win in Connecticut, that they should be on the alert during those times. On the other hand, if Bush is high in the Polls and there is no news of any decent consequence for Dems, then Jihadists should feel safe to pursue their goals with no fear of arrest. As many bloggers warn: If the democrats ever gain power... we're toast.
More on Iraq radicalized Jihadists:
The Astute Bloggers - FIGHTING-BACK AGAINST ISLAMOFASCISM IS THE REMEDY, AND DOESN'T MAKE THE ENEMY WORSE, Excerpt:
MCCARTHY at NRO's THE CORNER exposes the idiocy of the common claim that Bush and our robust, forward-leaning foreign policy - which includes actually fighting back and counter-attacking with our military - only makes the enemy worse/more popular and makes it easier for them to recruit:In the decade after we left Saddam Hussein in power rather than deposing him, representatives of the umma responded by bombing the World Trade Center (1993), Khobar (1996), the embassies (1998), the U.S.S. Cole (2000); unsuccessfully plotting to blow up much of Manhattan (1993), a bunch of airliners (1994-95), L.A. Int'l Airport (2000) and the U.S.S. The Sullivans (2000); and finally killing almost 3000 of us in suicide hijackings that destroyed the WTC and damaged the Pentagon. But [according to the Left and the NYTIMES - reliapundit] it was the Iraq war of 2003 that radicalized them.It couldn't possibly have been, say, the Koran's Sura 9:5 ("Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolators wherever ye find them, and take them captive, and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush.")
And here is a list of all Muslim Terror Attacks caused by Bush and his failed Iraq War.