Is the Quran Based on the Bible?


By Bernie on 06 Nov 2009


Muslims would like infidels to accept two mutually exclusive notions:


  1. Islam is a sister religion to Judaism and Christianity because, they insist, the Quran is based on the Torah and the Gospels; and

  2. The Torah and the Gospels that exist today are corruptions of the original holy texts.

Among themselves, Muslims say that the Quran is based on the original, pure, unadulterated "Tawrat" (Torah) and on the original, pure, unadulterated "Injeel" (Gospel), original text portions of which can be found in the Quran today, but uncorrupted versions of the originals are no longer extant.

So when Muslims want Christians or Jews to convert, they point out that Islam is just an extension, a natural progression, a fulfillment of the Bible. Non-Muslims are informed that Muslims believe in the same prophets, Abraham, Moses and Jesus, that the Quran is the final installment of God's Word as revealed in the older holy books.

Thus the deception: to the People of the Book (as Jews and Christians are called), Islam is presented as just another Abrahamic faith that shares their common values and spiritual traditions and that recognizes their Holy Books. Among themselves, Muslims see the People of the Book as poor deluded souls who believe in vile, corrupt, miscreant and unholy texts and who must, in the end, be either persuaded to see things the Muslim way or be subjugate and pay a tax.

Infidels of the other kind, such as Buddhists and Hindus, do not have a choice of maintaining their faith and paying a tax; for them the choice is either conversion or death.

So when one asks a Muslim, "Is the Quran Based on the Bible?" - the answer depends on who is asking. If it's an infidel, then the Muslim will deceive and answer, "Yes." If it's a Muslim asking, then his fellow Muslim will tell him the truth and answer, "No."

In a related matter, a number of Muslim readers by email have castigated me for calling Islam a religion of violence because of passages I quote from the Quran. They inform me that there are violent passages as well in the Bible and so I should not accuse Islam of being a violent religion without also calling Christianity or Judaism a violent religion.

Here, when it suits them, the violent passages in the Bible they point to are the uncorrupted and original texts. But why can't I use the argument that the pure, original Holy texts do not contain violent passages?

Actually I don't care if the Bible has barbaric verses. 2,000 years ago the Rabbis deemed the Laws in the Old Testament as too barbaric and amended Jewish Laws, specifically those that dealt with capital punishment. So while Jews had the good sense to realize that the Torah was written in savage and primitive times and needed to be re-interpreted for different times, Mohammed forced the old barbarisms to be written in stone, never to be changed.

Thus Muslims to this day will stone a woman for adultery or cut off a hand for thievery and then ask the infidel not to blame Islam because, in truth, isn't this exactly what is called for in the Torah? Why blame the Quran for savagery when the Bible is just as savage? Of course, there is a big difference: Modern Jews and Christians do not stone women for adultery nor do they cut off the hand of the thief.

Civilized Jews and Christians ignore the barbaric parts of the Bible; those that do not are usually put in a mental institution or in prison. Any American Christian or Jew who follows the instruction to put to death a child who disobeys him will be called a psychopath and a murderer. In Muslim cultures, Honor killing is de rigueur. It is a great dishonor to allow a child to live who marries against the parent's wishes, or who apostates, or who dresses as an infidel, etc.

A Christian or Jew who follows the savage laws in the Bible is called a savage and is punished by the law. A Muslim who follows the savage laws of the Quran is called a righteous man and is rewarded by the law.

Sane, civilized, decent people do not follow the violent parts of the Bible. Sadly, sane, civilized, decent Muslims must follow the violent parts of the Quran, to do otherwise is blasphemous and punishable by death.

Source: Islam World








Anyone may republish this article for non-commercial use without asking my permission. I make it easy, see details here.


Related Posts with Thumbnails
If this is your first time here, please read my Comment Policy HERE.

comments powered by Disqus


















HOME



Info


Email Me

FAQ/About Me

Search/Archives

Site Policies

Testimonials

My Articles in Danish

Follow Me:

subscribe to my Feedvia RSS Feed

subscribe to comment Feedvia my Comments Feed

subscribe to my YouTube Feedvia my YouTube Feed


View My Stats




Shameless Advertising


This is what Bernie is Reading Now



For Previous Books Click Here.





Comments



Buttons & Widgets


Locations of visitors to this page



Blogs That Link to Me:


123beta
A collection of things...
Always on Watch
Americans Stand with Israel
Animal Magnetism
Apropos of Nothing
Bare Naked Islam
Basil’s Blog
BelchSpeak
Blazing Cat Fur
Blogging for a free world
BlogWrath
Celestial Offerings
Cmblake6's Weblog
Commonsense & Wonder
Conjecture and Consequence
Conservative Thoughts
Cristy Li
Daily Blasphemies
David Drake
DiveDesk
DragonLady’s World
Eclecticity
Elder of Ziyon
Empyreum Cœlum
Eye of Polyphemus
Fausta’s Blog
Fiery Spirited Zionist
foolocracy
Gates of Vienna
GDCritter
Gummihund/ Rubberdog and a proud Orangutan
Hard to Swallow
Hodjanernes Blog
Huff-Watch
Infidelio
Infidels Are Cool
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Intergalactic Source of Truth
Iron Burka
Israel Matzav
Jewish Preppers
Jihadi Du Jour
Leather Penguin
Maggie’s Notebook
MFS - The Other News
mlah.us
Monkey in the Middle
Muellerstuff
Muslims Attack
My Gripes of Wrath
My Newz 'n Ideas
Neanderpundit
News on the March
News360
No Apology
nothing to laugh at
Nuke's
OBAMA CARTOONS
Oswald Bastable’s Ranting
Outside the Camp
Pakshahara
Perigo Islâmico (In Portuguese)
pislamonausea Central
Project 2,996
Prune Juice Media
RADARSITE
Ramrock's Blog (In Spanish)
Remember Amalek
Right Nation
Right Pundits
Right Truth
Right-wing Agenda
Rightjab
Rosemary’s Thoughts
Sherryx’s Weblog
Silence the messenger
Simply Jews
Smooth Stone
So Far, So Good ...So What!
SPLINA ULTRAGIATĂ A ZIONULUI
Squid Thoughts
Stop Islamic Conquest
StormBringer
SumanSpeaks
Sunday Morning Coffee
Synopsis
Tales of a Wandering Mind
TAYLOR TOPICS
The Amboy Times
The Astute Bloggers
The Christian Defender
The Infidel Task Force
The Lambeth Walk
The Lunatic's Asylum
The Mindset
The Old Curmudgeon
THE OUTRAGED SPLEEN OF ZION
The Political Commentator
The Right Nation
The Sandman
The Sassy Tn’T PoLITicallY InCorrect
THE TEXAS SCRIBBLER
The Unreligious Right
The Virtuous Republic
Theo Spark
Third World County
TheRightRant
Thunder Pig
Transhumanisten
Treppenwitz
usa stands with israel
Veritas Universalis
Western Civilization and Culture
wine women and transcendence
Working the Web
Xanthippa's Chamberpot
Zilla of the Resistance
Zionism, Rebbi Nachman, and Rav Kook


Would you be in favor of stopping aid to Africa if it would eliminate hunger and disease there?
  
pollcode.com free polls 
For more details about this poll click HERE