The most revealing comment is:

"I agree with the bloggers comments, I agree with the assessment of BWA, and I agree it's highly inappropriate and self-defeating to openly acknowledge it because it sells the argument short.

Leave the obvious out of it next time, bud."

So, my problem is that I stated what everyone already knows is the truth, Blacks hate Asians. I'm sorry, but I find it impossible for my fingers to reach the keyboard to write my blog if I'm forced to stick my head up my ass. If I wanted to hide the truth I would write for CNN or the New York Times.

When Jews do the wrong thing I call them self-loathing Jews or useful idiots or defeatist traitors (e.g. it is sad that 77% of American Jews oppose the Iraq War (1)). Should I sugarcoat the truth because I'm Jewish? Similarly, why should I pretend that race has nothing to do with the case at bar? What, so no one gets offended? Blacks should be offended. Black leaders like Al Sharpton should be pissed as hell and lecturing all his followers that racism against Jews and Asians is wrong. That all hatred for any group white, black, Asian is immoral. But that's hard to do when you are the hypocritical epitome of racism yourself. (2)

Some politically correct reader will object that everyone knows that Sharpton is a racist, violence-inciting bigot and greedy, self-aggrandising, ignorant bastard, why write such provocative and hurtful words? Well, if the MSM would just tell the truth, I wouldn't be forced to be alone here crying in the wilderness.

Interestingly, the majority of Jews live on the East and West Coasts [wiki map] while, contrary to common belief, blacks are least represented in those two areas [U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Demographic Supplement to the March 2002 Current Population Survey PDF]; so the majority of Jews are immunized against Black on Jew crimes by virtue of being in least contact with them. Unfortunately for those few Jews who do live in proximity to black neighborhoods, they well know that blacks are more anti-Semitic than whites (3).

This survey was sponsored by Jews and so I suspect they sugarcoated this report since they left out the percentage of blacks who hold mildly anti-Semitic beliefs. Regardless, there is no shortage of surveys to indicate that blacks are extremely more likely to hate Jews than any other group in America.

OK, you say, big deal, Blacks are more racist than any other group, so what? No one is getting hurt, are they, it's just an opinion, no?

No. People are getting hurt. Blacks are 1.85 times more likely to be the perpetrator of a hate crime than non-blacks (4).

OK, OK, you say, so blacks are the worst offenders in hate crimes, but Blacks are still the main object of racial violence, no?

No - the most likely victim of a hate crime in the U.S. is white (5).

So what have we shown: Blacks are more antisemitic than anyone else, are less likely to be victims of hate crimes and more likely to be the perpetrators. So it's unpleasant to hear, does that make it forbidden to say?

I am not ignoring the fact that blacks have the highest rates of poverty, infant mortality, unemployment and incarceration rates of any other group in America. That they are more likely to be racially profiled, that they go to the worst public schools. But whose fault is that? Al Sharpton's. Instead of concentrating on black on black crime, he focuses on the infinitesimally small number of incidents of cops who injure blacks or Jews who accidentally kill blacks.

Poor Korean and other Asian immigrants come to America and take their paltry earnings and savings to help other members of their race. Indeed, I market my phonecards to one large Korean deli cooperative who helps hundreds of other Koreans, strangers to him, set up businesses with loans and grants and advice. Chinese restaurants sprout like wildflowers in thousands of black neighborhoods. That they succeed in the midst of black neighborhoods is one source of the hatred against them. In a matter of a few years, Asians succeed in achieving the American dream with large homes, successful businesses, and sending their children to Ivy league schools while no black businesses dare to open other than a few hair salons.

Why isn't Al Sharpton demanding that black sports professionals, black actors, black rap stars and black millionaires use their wealth to bolster business and economic development in poor, urban black neighborhoods? Huh, eh, what? Why does Oprah open schools in Africa instead of Detroit?

Because she and other successful blacks have given up on black America. And young blacks know there is no one to care or help them, so they are left with nothing but crime to get their piece of the American pie. That a quarter of young black males are in prison is the fault of all the blacks who have made it and turned their backs on their own race. It is the fault of all black demagogues who blame whites for all the misfortunes besetting blacks in America, instead of placing the blame on themselves.

Al Sharpton is right in one regard: there is a race of people in America who are overly exploited, intimidated, physically attacked and victims of racism and hate crimes; but they ain't black folk.

---

If you haven't figured it out yet, it happens I am an activist in favor of blacks achieving the American dream. I hate and despise so-called black leaders like Al "diamond merchant" Sharpton and Jesse "himey town" Jackson who have done nothing but keep blacks poor, bigoted, ignorant and in despair so that they, Sharpton et al, will have a constituency.

Related:

While the ghettoes burn, Al Sharpton fiddles with inconsequential inanities like nappy-headed hoes.

Kerfuffles,
Nappy Headed Hoe

When did "nappy” become a verboten word and why is having "nappy hair” a disgrace? Since the year 1490, long before the English language came to America, the English word "nappy” was in use to describe a type of hair. There was curly hair, straight hair and nappy hair. What other hair words can now get a person thrown over the cliff? How about "bleach blond”; is that some sort of slur now? What about "bad hair”?

Planck's Constant, Sharpton on Gangsta Rap - Interview

Rev: That's a kike lie. Jews supported the apartheid government of South Africa so deys could get diamonds ta sell on 47th street in New York. How 'bout dere murder of those four girls who got killed in Birmingham in the 60s and the assassination of brother Malcolm X?

Bernie: Why do you persist in peddling those lies? You know it was blacks from the Nation of Islam.

Planck's Constant, Black Profiling is a necessary and good thing

If police officers pull over 1% more blacks than their proportion to the national average Al Sharpton and his band of white-bashers and cop-haters pop into action. If I were black I would loathe being pulled over more often than whites. However I would be safer precisely because they do so; they would be saving my black ass. And where is Al and his buddies when blacks attack blacks? (where a great proportion of crime is anyway.)

---

ENDNOTES

(1):

GALLUP, Among Religious Groups, Jewish Americans Most Strongly Oppose War

An analysis of Gallup Poll data collected since the beginning of 2005 finds that among the major religious groups in the United States, Jewish Americans are the most strongly opposed to the Iraq war.

Jewish people oppose the Iraq war by a better than 3-to-1 margin, 77% to 21%.

(2):

TMZ,
3 Mar 2007,
Sharpton Marches Against Words He Won't Apologize For

According to published accounts, Sharpton publicly bashed former NYC Mayor David Dinkins as "a n----r whore," and once referred to his political opponents as "recycled white trash." Sharpton has also never publicly renounced his 1991 inflammatory public remarks against "diamond merchants" -- after which a Harlem mob singled out a random 29-year-old Jewish rabbinical student -- and stabbed him to death.

(3):

UPI, 5 Apr 2005, Poll: 14 percent in U.S. are anti-Semitic

The number of blacks with strong anti-Semitic beliefs continued to remain high since 1992. The 2005 survey found 36 percent of African-Americans hold strong anti-Semitic beliefs, four times more than the 9 percent for whites.

(4):

FBI Crime in the US, 2002 - Crime Index, Hate Crimes

Race of Known Offenders, 2002

Total 7,314

White 4,517
Black 1,592
American Indian/Alaskan Native 43
Asian/Pacific Islander 87
Multiple Races, Group2 355
Unknown Race 720

Blacks represent 13% of the population in 2002 but are 1592/7314 or 21.8% of the known offenders in hate crimes. 21.8/13=1.669 times overly represented in hates crimes than should be expected by their percentage of population.

Non-Blacks represent 87% of the population but are 5722/7314 or 78.2% of the known offenders in hate crimes. 78.2/87=0.9 times under-represented in hate crimes than should be expected by their percentage of population.

Therefore blacks are 1.669/0.90 or 1.85 times more involved in hate crimes than non-blacks.

(5):

WND, 22Feb 2006, 'Hate crime' victims: Young, poor, white

WASHINGTON – The most likely victim of a hate crime in the U.S. is a poor, young, white, single urban dweller, according to an analysis of Justice Department statistics collected from between July 2000 and December 2003.

A November report by the Bureau of Justice Statistics detailing a study of 210,000 "hate crimes" a year during that period has gone virtually unreported by the U.S. press.

But it does contain some surprising numbers. While race is, by far, the No. 1 factor cited as the reason for hate crimes, blacks are slightly less likely to be victims and far more likely to be perpetrators, the statistics show.