British Blogger Lionheart
Photo Credit: Faultline USA
I warn about the threat of Islam to protect American lives. Sites like Americablog, the Daily KOS and other idiot Liberals warn us about the threat of the Patriot Act in order to protect a handful of Islamic Terrorists. It is an established fact that I know someone who knows someone, etc, who knows Kevin Bacon, but I do not know anyone who knows anyone who knows anyone who... knows someone who was ever arrested under the Patriot Act.
I do not wake up every morning wondering whether I or my wife will be whisked off to Guantanamo Bay, but I am concerned every time I drive through the Holland Tunnel or over the George Washington Bridge wondering if this will be the day Islam puts another notch on its sword. But Americablog wants us to Wear orange on Friday January 11 to protest Gitmo as if any decent law-abiding American really worries about being sent to Gitmo.
The best way for me to warn about the Threat of Islamic terror is to blog. The Patriot Act does not prevent me from doing this. The Patriot Act does not even prevent Muslims from blogging in the United States, as long as they don't try to raise money for al Qaeda and certainly no Liberal blogger has been arrested despite the fact that they publish traitorous sentiments every single day asking for the downfall of this government.
But you will not find too many Liberal blogs worrying about bloggers facing arrest for warning us against Islam.
Fellow blogger Lionheart sent me an email this morning to let me know a warrant has been issued for his arrest. Why? Because he blogs about Islamic terrorism. He says:I am currently out of the Country and on my return home to England I am going to be arrested by British detectives on suspicion of Stirring up Racial Hatred by displaying written material" contrary to sections 18(1) and 27(3) of the Public Order Act 1986.
When actual freedoms are at stake, idiot Liberals are missing from the fray. Smooth Stone points us to a report documenting the Democrat cowards who have gone soft and refuse to mention the Muslim enemy by its name. Excerpt:
If the New Hampshire debates settled anything, it's which party has the stomach to take on radical Islam. The Democrats couldn't even identify the enemy. Not once. Really.
We scanned the transcripts of Saturday's debates hosted by ABC News and tallied up the references to Islamic terrorism. The rhetorical divide between Democrats and Republicans on that score alone — ignoring the yawning gaps in policy — is stunning.
None of the four Democrat presidential candidates — despite running for an office that demands they lead the ongoing global war against Islamic extremists — could bring himself or herself to define the enemy we face as Islamic.
Their combined references to "Islam" or "Islamic" totaled zero — even though moderator Charles Gibson prompted them with a question about "Islamic radicals" threatening the U.S. with nuclear terrorism.
It has been suggested that everyone complain to the British Embassy in the United States; I did and left this query:
I would like to visit the UK but my religion is Islamophobia. Will I be discriminated against if I practice my religion, that is to say, my religion requires me to shout out, "Muslims are a threat to the Western World!" every few hours. Will I be arrested for a hate crime?
Before anyone says thank god we don't have this problem in the US:
5 Jan 2007,
Defense Department Critic of Islam Sacked
Mr. Coughlin was notified this week that his contract with the Joint Staff will end in March, effectively halting the career of one of the U.S. government's most important figures in analyzing the nature of extremism and ultimately preparing to wage ideological war against it.
The officials said Mr. Coughlin was let go because he had become "too hot" or controversial within the Pentagon.