Taken into Custody for wearing red dress
Photo by: FARS News Agency
When Russia was still Soviet and some of her citizens came to America to escape persecution, would we have tolerated the emigre's continued allegiance to Communism? Shouldn't a person who comes to America for freedom embrace the ideals that make that freedom possible? Shouldn't a person who flees a country because of oppression renounce the ideological pillars of that oppression?
In the same manner, when a Muslim comes to America to live and work permanently because Islam made his home country intolerable to live in, shouldn't that person have the common decency to renounce Islam and assimilate into our culture? Should we tolerate that Muslim's continued devotion to a failed faux religion and accept his demands that we accommodate his religious requirements, that we renounce our westernized way of life (1), that we cover our women, that we sign on to an international law that criminalizes religious insults, that we rewrite texts that offend Muslims, that we remove commonplace items that happen to be insults to Islam, of which there are thousands?
The proper, decent, civilized thing for Muslims who have come to America to escape the horrific living conditions in their own countries due to Islamic laws and governance should be to renounce Islam. Just FYI, Ahmed, in America it is no crime to become a non-Muslim, so don't worry, we will not kill you for apostasy as they do in Muslim countries. I hope one day, when America comes to its senses, we will require immigrants to state categorically that they will no longer be faithful to a savage and ignorant cult just as we require them to renounce allegiance to Communism.
Global Policy Forum, Naturalization Oath of Allegiance to the United States of America
"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the armed forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."
Islam is a political system with its own law (Shariah) and its own nation: dar al-Islam. For Muslims the world is divided into two nation groups: dar al-Islam, the house of Islam and dar al-Harb, the house of war. If Muslims live in dar al-Harb (and our war in Iraq has put America in that house) then Jihad must be used to bring America into the house of Islam. Muslims in America who refuse to renounce Islam are required by their religion to wage war against America. When they take their oath of allegiance to become American citizens they must then also renounce their political allegiance to Islam.
As example that Muslims consider themselves a nation unto themselves regardless of their residency in another country let's look at India just before partition:
hvk.org, Muslims not a minority
The shari'ah was supreme and the Islamic world recognised India as a dar-ul Islam. The conquered lands which were distributed to the followers of the conquerors, were given away as wakfs. India became a dar-ul harb only after the British government assumed direct control over the Indian empire in 1858.
The Muslim population at that time was 15 per cent. Evidently, the minority ruled a majority for many centuries in most parts of the country. With the advent of the British, Muslims also became subjects like Hindus.
At the turn of the 20th century, the myth of 'minority' began to be discussed. The British also played along with the new myth because it suited them for the purpose of divide and rule. The self-proclaimed Muslim minority had little interest in safeguards. Instead, they insisted on parity with Hindus. The high watermark of parity was reached when the British government conceded the right of the Muslim League to have an equal number of ministers in the pre-Partition cabinet at New Delhi.
In any case, until it suited Nehruvian politics, 'minority' was seldom on the minds of Muslims. They believed themselves to be a separate nation. This justified their demand for Partition. A minority, as understood in Europe, was supposed to be patriotic. Its members were loyal citizens but because they belonged to a different religion or ethnicity, they needed safeguards.
On the other hand, they were punishable, including as traitors, in the event of disloyalty. Secession resulting in Pakistan should have been treated as treason if the Muslims were to claim to be a minority. It is only because they claimed to be a nation that they were given a separate homeland.
Wow, only 15% of the population is enough for a minority to rule a country. If history is any indication then we are only a few decades away from Islamic takeovers in many countries in Europe.
In a related vein, I would like to suggest that every man and woman born in America, upon attaining the age of 18, also be required to take this very exact oath and declare their allegiance to this country. Perhaps in this manner we can eliminate most of the Liberals we now tolerate and who support the enemies of this country. I realize that with this suggestion, more Jews than Muslims are likely to be thrown out of the country since at least 80% of my fellow Jews are Liberal idiots. I am not advocating deporting or exiling Liberals just because they are Liberals, only those who refuse to swear allegiance to our country and who refuse to support our Constitution.
Disclaimer: I am not in the anti-immigrant camp. I support an unrestricted, but fully documented immigration policy, read Let all 100 million Mexicans come to America, I am however opposed to Muslims coming to live here who fail to renounce Islam, Mexicans who fail to renounce Aztlán, Russians/Chinese/Cubans who fail to renounce Communism and so on.
CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper indicated in a 1993 interview with the Minneapolis Star Tribune that he wants to see the United States become a Muslim country.
"I wouldn't want to create the impression that I wouldn't like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future," Hooper told the Star Tribune. "But I'm not going to do anything violent to promote that. I'm going to do it through education."