Islam is Incompatible with Democracy from Planck's Constant

Leftists and others ignorant of the contents of the Quran and the overwhelming control Islam has over the faithful, believe Muslims are just like everyone else. For example, Dean Esmay asked this question of Michelle Malkin a few years ago:

Dean's World, Question for Michelle Malkin: Does the Conscience of a Conservative Still Exist?
I’m making an open appeal to your conscience, Michelle Malkin, and to the conscience of conservatives everywhere: shouldn’t you start making a distinction between Muslims who hate us and want to kill us, and Muslims who believe in freedom, democracy, and religious tolerance?

Here's a news flash, Dean: Muslims who believe in freedom, democracy, and religious tolerance are not Muslims. They may call themselves Muslims so as to not worry about what Mohammed might do, but they are essentially apostates to their faith if they truly believe in freedom, democracy, and religious tolerance.

Unfortunately, like Germans who were not Nazis in their heart but were afraid to say differently so as not to worry about what Adolph might do, they were still treated as the enemy and rightly so.

poster for the Four Pests Campaign of 1958

Four Pests Campaign of 1958
Photo Credit: International Institute
of Social History

Dean's World thinks that one cannot declare war on over a billion Muslims. Why not? Mao Tse Tung starting in 1958 got rid of 600 billion flies, mosquitoes, rats and sparrows with his Four Pests Campaign.

Eyewitnesses from that period recall from their youth how they would bang pots and pans so that the poor birds would not have the chance to rest on any tree branches, and would fall dead from the sky from exhaustion. It should be noted that including sparrows in the Four Pests Campaign was not a good idea since sparrows are necessary to keep other insects such as locusts in check; despite that error, the campaign shows there is nothing that cannot be accomplished to eliminate a sub-species even in the tens of billions. All that is necessary is the will to do so.

If the followers of Islam do not become civilized and disavow those portions of the Quran that are inimical to civilized society (some 90% of it) then we will one day be forced to eliminate, yes, a billion or so of those fanatics.

But back to Dean's argument that we should not treat all Muslims as enemies of our country. He doesn't give any arguments to back up that assertion other than whining about a handful of Muslims that died for this country. I'm sure a few pedophiles and rapists died defending our country during WWII, but does this mean I should now cross pedophiles and rapists off the "do not invite to dinner list"? That we should give them a "get out of jail free" card? That we should stop calling them criminals? What a liberal idiot!

Here is Malkin's response:

Michelle Malkin, How not to argue about Islam
Notice the absence of a single link or a specific quotation of anything I’ve ever written (at least as of this posting). Very Ralph Peters-esque. He “calls me out” by citing…something written by blogger Gary Metz. He relies on overwrought non sequiturs (Muslims are buried at Arlington National Cemetery!) ...

And from Pierre Legrand's Pink Flamingo Bar:

Dean Esmay, spittle flying defends Islam against insults…
Not a single person I have read in the mainstream or even near the mainstream is calling for an all out war against Muslims. Yet he retreats to this nonsense every single time someone declares Islam not compatible with Democracy.

Then he screws up analogies to try and defend the indefensible, stating that if we declare Islam to be incompatible with democracy that this is akin to us back in WW2 declaring ourselves at war with all Germanic people. huh? Being born Germanic is not a choice Dean…being a Muslim is a choice.

There are only two things you need to know about Dean Esmay:

He reads constantly. Mostly history and social science, but economics, hard science, religion, spirituality, and fiction are usually somewhere in the rotation. He is usually reading at least two books at one time.

In His words: "As is well known, I have absolutely no sense of humor."

Number 1 shows that one can be well read and still be a liberal idiot. And Number 2 shows, he's a humorless liberal idiot. I do not trust anyone who will not laugh at my jokes.