Muslim Immigrants Cost Too Much to Bear
Photo Credit: Logan’s Warning
For the past 1400 years Islam was spread both by the sword and by making life so unbearable for dhimmis that conversion was the only choice left to Christians and Jews living under so-called tolerant Islamic rule. Muslims left infidels only three choices: death, conversion or slavery.
Today, Islam is spreading by a force greater than the sword. No, the force is not al qaeda or the myriad number of other Islamic extremist groups - they are not helping to spread Islam at all.
The force I am talking about is immigration. Islam is growing faster in non-Muslim countries than any other religion. Once Muslims come into a country they bleed it dry through welfare and other entitlements while reproducing at a higher rate than native infidels, see my article Europe is Declining yet its Population is Increasing.
Here are some startling facts about Muslims in the UK:
UP Pompeii, 11 Oct 2012, It's always been about the demographics - and the effects of critical mass
Daily Telegraph reported in 2012 that 75% of all Muslim women are unemployed while 50% of all Muslim men are unemployed - rise from 13% for men and 18% for women in 2004. Muslims are also on sick leave more than anyone else, with 24% of females and 21% of males claiming a disability (2001 figures). Muslims are the most likely among all religious groups to be living in accommodation rented from the council or housing association (28%); 4% live rent-free (2004 figures). As if this is not enough, the total prison population in the UK amongst category A and B criminals (the worse crimes) is now 35-39% Muslim.
Although the statistics do not make it fully clear how many actually collect benefits, a rough estimate can be made. Money-wise it means that out of 5 million Muslims living in Britain (2012 estimates increased the number from the previous 3 million claiming the past numbers were inaccurate), 4.25 million Muslims, or 85%, live off tax payers. If we average this with a simple, quick calculation of the minimum benefit payment of £67 a week, at least £ 284,750,000 per week (£1.1 billion per month) is spent from taxpayer money for Muslims who don’t contribute anything whatsoever to Britain’s revenues – except making more Muslims.
Now I am not opposed to Muslims because they have a high birthrate - a high birthrate is not a problem as long as those being born will eventually contribute something of value to society. Certainly the world would benefit greatly if only there were more Jews.
This is Not about Xenophobia
I am not opposed to Muslims because they are foreigners. I was born in Uzbekistan and so I came to this country as a foreigner. In fact, in a 2006 article of mine I wrote that as far as I am concerned it's OK if we Let all 100 million Mexicans come to America - provided they come in legally.
I am not opposed to Muslims for any reason other than they come here not to integrate or accept our way of life but to change our society, culture and law into an Islamic society, culture and law. This is not my opinion, this is the prime directive from Mohammed himself. When Mohammed was on his deathbed and was the complete and utter ruler of the Arabian Peninsula, he ordered that there not be two religions in Arabia:
USC-MSA Compendium of Muslim Texts, Malik's Muwatta, Book 45, Number 45.5.17
Yahya related to me from Malik from Ismail ibn Abi Hakim that he heard Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz say, "One of the last things that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said was, 'May Allah fight the jews and the christians. They took the graves of their Prophets as places of prostration . Two deens shall not co-exist in the land of the Arabs.' "
If Mohammed had been ruler of the Earth before he died, there would not be two deens (religions) in the world. There would only be Islam. Muslims believe that so it is written, so shall it be done.