There is No Such Thing as a Lone Wolf Islamic Attack
First off, just what is the meaning of a 'lone wolf' and what is the purpose of using such a term? Wikipedia tells us: "The term "lone wolf" is used by US law enforcement agencies and the media to refer to individuals undertaking violent acts of terrorism outside a command structure." The definition tells us the purpose: to dissociate an act of terror from those who inspire it; that is, if a Muslim commits an act of terror, we should ignore the ideology that inspired it.
As far as our government is concerned, there have been no Muslim terror attacks in the US:
Breitbart News Network, 7 Other Lone Wolf Islamic Attacks Inside the U.S.
... the Obama administration has repeatedly treated “lone wolf” Islamic terror inside the United States as though it were non-terrorist crime ...
The Obama administration takes great pains never to label Islamic terror as such inside the United States; instead, we are told, we should focus disproportionately on the threat of right-wing groups like the Tea Party.
Consider the following: it's 1943 in America and a recent convert to Nazism attacks and kills two policemen. Would anyone in their right mind say that this was a lone wolf attack and nothing to do with the Nazis in Germany? Is it really necessary to find a direct order from Adolf Hitler on the person to blame Nazism for the attack?
Suppose a long-time adherent of Nazism suddenly decided to kill 13 fellow soldiers at an army base, would we call that a lone wolf attack or insanely worse, work-place violence? If we had, America would have lost World War Two for lack of identifying our enemy. And by the way, why would we, in 1943, ever allow a Nazi sympathizer to be on an army base? Why are we allowing Muslims, especially devout Muslims, to be in our military? Are we that stupid?
Some of my readers may object that just because some Muslims use the Qur'an to guide their terrorist acts does not mean all Muslims will become terrorists. My response? Who cares if not all Muslims are terrorists? As I wrote in a previous article 90% of Nazis were not Evil, that is, 90% of Nazis never killed anyone, but does that mean they were never a threat to western civilization?
Most Muslims are not terrorists because they have not understood the Qur'an. The reason so many recent converts go Jihad is because they earnestly read and understood the Qur'an. When they go on Jihad, it is not an act of a 'lone wolf,' it is an act of a soldier in the war against the infidel. Soldiers in a war do not need a written direct command from the general to know what to do when in enemy territory: he knows his duty is to render destruction against all those who stand in the way of dar al-Islam, a world caliphate.
When it comes to Muslims, there is no such thing as a lone wolf attack.
