Posted on September 14, 2009 01:04 PM
See the photo above? What would the world have said of the New York Times if in 1945, instead of printing this photo out of respect for the sensitivities of Nazis, the New York Times instead merely mentioned that "soldiers entering the death camps saw dead bodies stacked everywhere."
Posted on July 30, 2007 09:54 PM
it will be very difficult for liberals to accept victory because of their previously having so readily accepted defeat
Posted on August 25, 2006 04:55 PM
In my companion piece Aljazeera more truthful and balanced than the NY Times, I asked why leftist Jews who run the NY Times are more anti-Israel than Al Jazeera. Just in case the links in that article disappear here is the entire Al Jazeera report. This cache of Al Jazeera's story is used to illustrate the differences between the slanted, biased, anti-Israel point of view of the New York Times and unbelievably the more complete and balanced view of Al...
Posted on August 25, 2006 03:25 AM
Why is it that leftist Jews who run the NY Times are more anti-Israel than Al Jazeera? A man stood Wednesday on the site of a building in a southern suburb of Beirut destroyed by an Israeli attack. A sign, left, blamed the United States...
Posted on August 22, 2006 05:39 PM
In my companion piece Aljazeera more truthful and balanced than the NY Times, I asked why leftist Jews who run the NY Times are more anti-Israel than Al Jazeera. Just in case the links in that article disappear here is the entire NY Times report. This cache copy of the NY Times article is kept here as a convenience for my readers to show that the NY Times is an anti-Israel, anti-American piece of shit newspaper that reports only one...
Posted on July 18, 2006 02:05 PM
I have a suggestion: How about the New York Times stops printing seditious and treasonous crap that only emboldens our enemies,
Posted on July 6, 2006 06:15 PM
Keller made a point that everyone, including terrorists, have long been on notice that we are doing everything we can to track their finances. Not quite everyone. According to Reuters, 26 Jun 2006,Belgium probes legality of US bank record searchesBelgium's government said on Monday it was investigating the legality of counter-terrorism searches by U.S. officials of thousands of private records held by Brussels-based international bank cooperative SWIFT. U.S. media reported last week that the U.S. Treasury Department had been tapping...
Posted on July 1, 2006 06:59 PM
Back in March of this year, Lotta Twotta applied for a job at the New York Times for the position of News Editor. She was promptly hired because of her huge IQ and her ability to keep abreast of items of important public interest. She worked directly under Executive Editor Bill Keller [wink-wink-nudge-nudge] and was with Keller when the administration argued for the withholding of the SWIFT information. Lotta told Keller that the G-Men were staring at the vast repository...
Posted on April 12, 2006 01:57 PM
That's right, before 9/11 9.3% left active duty and now, at the very height of the most fierce fighting in Iraq there are fewer, only 8.6%, leaving. If the NY Times was not so blinded by hatred of George Bush the headline should have ran, "Young Officers Leaving Army at a lower rate than before 9/11". But that would have been a positive headline, eh?
Posted on February 14, 2006 09:58 PM
The New York Times and other spineless, obsequious, bowing and scraping rags pretended that out of respect for the sensitivities of Muslims they declined to republish the cartoons. It was obvious to anyone that the true reason was fear.
Posted on January 24, 2006 03:39 PM
Anyone who reads the New York Times will notice that there are very few articles critical of Islam. The reasons may be either that the paper is so stupidly Liberal that it is loathe to appear intolerant or it has fears that Muslims will naturally blown up their building. I have a suggestion on how they can write articles so that we the public can still get the news while the newspaper can avoid any appearance of intolerance or retaliation from Muslims.
See the photo above? What would the world have said of the New York Times if in 1945, instead of printing this photo out of respect for the sensitivities of Nazis, the New York Times instead merely mentioned that "soldiers entering the death camps saw dead bodies stacked everywhere."
I have a suggestion: How about the New York Times stops printing seditious and treasonous crap that only emboldens our enemies,
That's right, before 9/11 9.3% left active duty and now, at the very height of the most fierce fighting in Iraq there are fewer, only 8.6%, leaving. If the NY Times was not so blinded by hatred of George Bush the headline should have ran, "Young Officers Leaving Army at a lower rate than before 9/11". But that would have been a positive headline, eh?
The New York Times and other spineless, obsequious, bowing and scraping rags pretended that out of respect for the sensitivities of Muslims they declined to republish the cartoons. It was obvious to anyone that the true reason was fear.
