Aljazeera more truthful and balanced than the NY Times
A friend emailed me an interesting question: Why is it that leftist idiot Jews who run the NY Times are more anti-Israel than Al Jazeera? (This question also applies to all the anti-Israel leftist idiot Jews who run other newspapers as well)
A man stood Wednesday on the site of a building in a southern suburb of Beirut destroyed by an Israeli attack. A sign, left, blamed the United States
Two newspapers have run stories about the Amnesty International (AI) claim that Israel committed war crimes bombing Lebanon. Both stories gave the AI position and both had statements from the Israeli side defending itself.
One of the two stories specifically mentioned that AI did not accuse Hezbollah of war crimes, even though they deliberately shot rockets onto purely civilian targets, with the only possible object being to injure civilians.
The two papers were Al Jazeera and the NY Times. Al Jazeera was the more honest and more complete story and mentioned the failure of Amnesty International to condemn Hezbollah. The Times ignored that.
Here is the NY Times version. [if the link rots visit my cache of it here]
Interestingly, Al Jazeera had the photo below in its report but the New York Times had no photos of Israeli injuries from Hezbollah's attacks.
God forbid we get any sympathy for the Israeli side of the story from the NY Times.
Here is what was in the Al Jazeera report but NOT in the NY Times.
On its website the Israeli military provides video and photographs showing Hezbollah firing rockets from civilian areas.
Foreign journalists based in Lebanon also reported that the Shia militia chose to fight from civilian areas and had on occasion prevented Lebanese civilians from fleeing conflict-hit areas of south Lebanon.
Al-Manar, Hezbollah's satellite channel, also showed footage of Hezbollah firing rockets from civilian areas and produced animated graphics showing how Hezbollah fired rockets at Israeli cities from inside villages in southern Lebanon.
During the four week war Hezbollah fired 3,900 rockets at Israeli towns and cities with the aim of inflicting maximum civilian casualties.
The Israeli government says that 44 Israeli civilians were killed in the bombardments and 1,400 wounded.
AI has not issued a report accusing Hezbollah of war crimes.
Interesting, isn't it? A paper catering to Muslims has a more complete and honest report about the reality of Hezbollah's war crimes, yet the defeatist, leftist, liberal, treasonous grey bitch in New York can't bring herself to present even a mild criticism of Islamic butchers.
I have in previous posts accused the NY Times of being completely worthless and that leftists and defeatists were enemies to this great nation of ours.
It is plain the New York Times supports Hezbollah and is an enemy of this county. The publishers should not be allowed to hide behind the First Amendment and use the Constitution as a piece of toilet paper to wipe its ass with. All the leaks about the NSA and the SWIFT program were purposely done to destroy the efficacy of this administration's efforts in the War on Terror.
I know that Islamic fascists will attack this country again. I wish there was a way I could convince our Islamic friends to blow up the New York Times building. This way only worthless leftists and other lowlife traitors would die and we can rid ourselves of this piece of shit rag. Oh. Is that politically incorrect? Wishing that terrorists would attack us on American soil?
Well, it's only a wish, at least I don't directly aid our enemies. I can only make futile wishes; the New York Times actually facilitates our coming destruction.
DISCLAIMER: A few months back Michelle Malkin criticized UC Santa Cruz Chancellor Denice Denton who later committed suicide. If anyone at the New York Times actually jumps out of the building because of the unbearable tension of waiting for a terror attack, it is their own fault and not mine. If you can live with yourself for working for your treasonous boss, then you deserve to die. I am sorry to say that but we now face the greatest threat to western civilization ever. Yes, even a greater threat than Nazism or Communism. Companies like the Times have to be shut down. I suggest you leave and find a job that doesn't require you to help destroy our country.
Do you think Americans will tolerate liberals when an American city is nuked and it is discovered that you leftist scum kept them from being detected because of the defeat of anti-terror weapons such as the NSA? I certainly will be calling for all of you to be put up against a wall and shot. Nothing personal.
And please, in regard for my wish that all of you liberals be killed, give me all the deference and respect that you do to Hezbollah, Hamas, al Qaeda, and the rest of the terror world. In other words, keep your mouth shut.
Just in case you think I am singling out American liberal idiots, I propose that European leftists and American leftist Jews be shot as well:
right wing nation,
Speaking Of Zingers
Jonathan has a pretty good one over at GOP Bloggers:Every time you think the French have descended to the depths of depravity, duplicity and mendacity, you learn something new that makes them even more detestable. Every time.Oh. Of course. That's in response to Nidra Poller's op-ed in the WSJ Europe:Barah Mikhail, a fellow of the French government-friendly IRIS think tank, spelled it out in an Aug. 19 radio interview: France doesn't want to be put in a situation where its soldiers would have to side with Israel against Hezbollah. To choose between a Western democratic ally and a terrorist organization seems too morally troubling for Paris.
Those silly French! Sacre Jue, who to shoot? The terrorists hiding behind dead babies or civilians defending themselves against attack? decisions, decisions.
think-Israel.org, THE NEW YORK TIMES AND THE JEWS
The New York Times narcissistically regards itself as the patron saint of minorities. The paper shifts into attack mode whenever it sees the slightest and most ephemeral whiff of prejudice against blacks, women, or immigrants -- especially Muslims. Private golf clubs, college sports teams, corporations, the Patriot Act, all have been tarred by the Times in their quest to abolish prejudice.
Yet the New York Times seems to take the opposite approach when dealing with one particular minority: Jews. The Times' method of dealing with antisemitism ranges across a very narrow and disheartening spectrum: indifference, whitewashing, defense and promotion of its practitioners, and finally, and most repugnantly, the paper itself seems to occasionally engage in antisemitism.
flopping aces - A Democrat’s Trip Paid By Terrorists, Excerpt:
Nothing shows the bias more in a news organization then when they decide to leave the party affiliation out of a article when it concerns a Democrat:CHICAGO — Rep. Danny Davis is on the defense Thursday over a recent trip that was sponsored by a known terrorist group.Wha-wha-what! A politician took an all expense paid for trip to Sri Lanka at the expense of a known terrorist group and they leave out the simple fact that he is a DEMOCRAT!
Davis and an aide went to Sri Lanka last year on a trip paid for by the Tamil Tigers. That group is on the government’s list of known terrorists groups for its use of suicide bombers and child soldiers.
Davis maintains he didn’t know the Tigers paid for the trip.
gateway pundit, An Honest Look at the Security Situation in Iraq
Last week the New York Times wrote that "the insurgency in Iraq has gotten worse by almost all measures":Bombs Aimed at G.I.’s in Iraq Are Increasing
But, Back Talk took at a look at 7 month trends and found a very different picture of Iraq.
atlas shrugs - Murdering Liars and their Accomplices the Jihad Media, Excerpt:
Zombietime, blogger nonparallel, exposes another hoax, another blood libel against the Jews here.
The Red Cross Ambulance Incident
How the Media Legitimized an Anti-Israel Hoax and Changed the Course of a War
don surber - We’re at war: Turn off Hezbollah TV, Excerpt:
The feds arrested Javed Iqbal of New York for offering access to a Hezbollah-run TV channel called al-Manar. Said the Washington Post news story:The U.S. Treasury Department in March designated al-Manar a "global terrorist entity” and a media arm of the Hezbollah terrorist network. The designation froze al-Manar's assets in the United States and prohibited any transactions between Americans and al-Manar.
red state blue - Anatomy of a Hit-Piece, Excerpt:
... both Hezbollah and Iraqi "Muj" are therefore entirely dependent on the political leanings and journalistic ambitions of American media practitioners and their agents to make their objectives a reality...
curiouser & curiouser - Wading Through The BS Finds Some Truth, Excerpt:
In a Washington Post news report written by Thomas Ricks, we see this stunning headline, "Officer Called Haditha Routine" with the sub-headline, "Marine Said Deaths Didn't Merit Inquiry.
"If you read nothing more than that, it is truly stunning. Why? Because not only is the officer saying that it is likely that there was no "massacre" or "war crime" or "murder of innocent civilians" as Jack Murtha has claimed, but the situation was such that it didn't even warrant an investigation. From someone who spent ten years in the military, I can assure you that means nothing - repeat nothing - points toward any wrong-doing by the Marines in Haditha that Murtha has disgraced with his sick comments.
Want to see the face of evil, liberal, terrorist-supporting swine? Click on the photo to read: On September 25, 2006, Lynne Stewart Will Be Sentenced And You Can Help Lynne Receive The Maximum Sentence Allowed For Her Crimes Against America:
Am I crazy or is this ugly traitor a dead ringer for Michael Moore in drag?